← Back to Comparisons
TRANSFORMATION MODEL

Start: Wildlife Conservation Fund

Traditional NGO

Legacy Conservation Model

Traditional model: Donors give to a central "black box." Funds pay for admin, ads, and eventually some reaches the field. It is hard to know if a specific tiger was saved.

Traditional Bottlenecks

  • ⚠High Administrative Overhead (up to 30%)
  • ✕Compliance is post-trade & reactive
  • ✕Assets trapped in siloed databases

The Utility Foundation

The Foundation Model

The TUF Model: "Direct-to-Species." You donate to a specific sensor node covering a specific hectare. The node only releases funds to the ranger patrol if it detects live animal activity and no poaching incidents for the month.

The Foundation Standard

  • ✓Real-Time Reporting: Audit-grade data, block by block.
  • ✓Automated Compliance: Rules enforced by smart contract code.
  • ✓Asset Fluidity: Tokenized for instant, global liquidity.

Performance Delta

TUF_PROTOCOL
LEGACY_NGO
Settlement Speed
+86% Improvement
98%
Audit Precision
+54% Improvement
99%
Operating Cost
+57% Improvement
92%
Resource Recovery
+75% Improvement
95%
// SOURCE: FOUNDATION_AUDIT_2025// ENCRYPTION: SHA-256_ACTIVE// STATUS: OPTIMIZED